英語力と世界のトレンドを同時にキャッチ!!

  マットBlog

英語能力と収入は相関関係

かなり昔に楽天の三木谷氏がNo English, No Jobs と言ったことが話題になりましたね。数年前にブログでも書きましたが・・・・ 昔のブログ-->No English, No Jobs 2011 Oct. 4th ある統計学の本に 「英語が話せる日本人と給与に相関関係はあるとは言えない」と書かれていた記憶があります。 何故、相関しないかというと給与が高い職種についている人がたまたま英語が話せる人が多いからだ、という論理だった思います。 これを読んだ後は、『ああ、英語が出来ても必ずしも待遇面で得をするわけではないんだ・・・』と信じていました。 そんな時に以下の記事を発見! English proficiency contributes to higher income levels 英語の運用能力が収入に貢献 込み入った英語で書かれていないので、是非一読頂ければと思います。 それにしてもEnglish Proficiency Indexなる指数を作ってしまうとは驚きました。 世界で40か国、200万人を対象にアンケート調査をした結果を指数化したのですね。 English skills and income levels correlate in a "virtuous" cycle.....とあるように英語力と収入はcorrelate (相関)している。 in a virtuous cycle 好循環で! この指数は明らかにしています。 この記事はマレーシアのメディアだと思われるのですが、記事の中でハーバード大学卒業の女性のコメントには頷いてしまいました。 Harvard University undergraduate admissions interviewer Nadiah Wan said the ability to communicate well in English has helped her advance in her career. She said: "Students will find it difficult to access knowledge and express their opinions without a strong command of the English language. The reason is because the majority of new discoveries, new intellectual discussions and new cultural developments at this point in time are in English. ↑ナーディシュさんは、英語でのコミュニケーション(能力)が彼女のキャリアの一助になったと断言しています。「生徒達は、かなり強力(高い)な英語運用能力がなければ(新しい)知識にアクセスすることも、自らの意見を表現するのもままならない事だと気づきます」と彼女は言っています。 何故なら、(世界の)新しい発見、知的議論、あらたな文化的な進展などはすべて英語で書かれ、話されているからなのです。---そんな内容ですね。 彼女最後には、英語が話せるお蔭で、米国で勉強ができたことやネットワークが広がったことなども付け加えていますね。(最後のパラグラフ) でも日本は14位でmoderateだそうです。 自信を持たなければ!! まず、お隣の国が13位なので頑張って13位になりましょう。 Kuala Lumpur August 9, 2012 A study has found a correlation between English proficiency and a country's gross national income. Countries with higher income per capita tend to be more proficient in the English language, based on the findings of international education company Education First (EF), using a standardised measurement for adult English proficiency. The EF English Proficiency Index (EF EPI) is based on the results of a 2007 to 2009 survey covering more than 2 million people in over 40 countries. English skills and income levels correlate in a "virtuous" cycle where greater proficiency in the language leads to higher income. The gross national income per capita for countries that scored over 60 in the EF EPI was more than US$40,000 in 2008. Norway, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden and Finland have the highest scores, between 61 and 70, clinching the top five spots, indicating "very high proficiency". This is followed by other European countries - Austria, Belgium and Germany, which are ranked sixth, seventh and eighth under the "high proficiency" cluster. Next comes Malaysia, the only Asian country in the top 10, with a score of 55.54 for "high proficiency" in the English language. In the moderate proficiency level (EPI score 50-55), English skills do not correspond with higher income, indicating that other factors come into play in generating national income for those countries. Among the countries that scored below 45 points are Peru, Vietnam, Kazakhstan and Turkey, which have "very low proficiency" in the English language. The EF EPI enables countries to evaluate their English proficiency, and is useful in gauging the effectiveness of English-language policies. Compiled by EF, the official language training provider to the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the report states that up to 2 billion people will learn English in the next decade. The report also covers age suitability for learning English. It states that learning English at a younger age does not mean better proficiency in the language. Although children in Spain and Italy started English between the ages of eight and 11, the two countries have the lowest adult proficiency levels in the European Union, compared to children in the Netherlands and Denmark, who started English courses between ages 10 and 12 (1984-2000). The report cites factors like duration of learning, quality of instructors and teaching materials and methods as being essential in acquiring the language skills. Parent Action Group for Education (Page) Malaysia chairman Datin Noor Azimah Abdul Rahim said European countries like Norway, Sweden and Denmark place just as much emphasis on the English language as their native languages. English has always been the universal language of communication in commerce, science and technology, said Noor Azimah, who has 14 years' experience in the corporate world. Citing the newly-launched Tun Razak Exchange project, in which more than 100 top international companies are expected to set up base and transform Kuala Lumpur into a leading global centre for finance, trade and services, she said it is now even more important for Malaysians to raise their standard of English and gear themselves up for future progress and development. Harvard University undergraduate admissions interviewer Nadiah Wan said the ability to communicate well in English has helped her advance in her career. She said: "Students will find it difficult to access knowledge and express their opinions without a strong command of the English language. The reason is because the majority of new discoveries, new intellectual discussions and new cultural developments at this point in time are in English. "It doesn't mean that you can't come up with an idea like the iPhone or Facebook if you don't speak English. But it does mean that you will be one of the last people to find out about it and will, therefore, always have to play catch up while the rest of the world continues to innovate. Not being able to keep up and compete will also translate into lower salaries." The Harvard graduate added: "Without English skills, I cannot be part of those discoveries, discussions and developments. I certainly would not have gone to university abroad and would never have had the opportunity to learn from other English speakers, nor would I have as many friends around the world." (Nation Multi Media誌から)